feng1

This capacity allows every normal human being with an inner world or inner state Links of London states of consciousness. Let us call the totality of this inner consciousness subjectivity. The sum total of all internal subjective human states being the sum of all human subjectivity can be further subdivided to that which we are conscious of and those we are not. That portion that we are conscious, let us label conscious subjective reality and that portion which we are not conscious, let us label as unconscious subjective reality. Objective reality is everything else outside of subjective reality which exists outside of internal states Links of London Q Charm similarly may be further sub partitioned as observable objective reality and that which is not. To summarise, if reality is all that exists which may be partitioned to be subjective and objective, then that part of subjective reality which we are conscious is labelled as conscious subjective reality and that portion that we are unaware, we label as unconscious subjective reality. Objective reality, on the other hand, is all the remaining part of reality which is non subjective. That part of objective reality which is inaccessible to human sense experience constitutes 'invisible objective reality', the other being 'visible objective reality' Links of London P Charm Hatcher,in particular, p. to . Such a discourse may be reduced to a diagram. Please see diagram . Such a discourse and classification provides us an explanation of our reality that may explain where Foucault' s human sciences come from and why discourses about income have never resulted in a precise definition or agreement. If such a depiction of reality is accepted, then theories about income fall within the subjective unconscious reality, as theories about income are not objective and are not conscious subjective reality. This is so because income is an abstraction which we are not aware of. Rather, income lies in the subjective unconscious reality, and we create and construct it through discourses, within accounting and economics. Mythmaking about the reporting of income Few topics generate more impassioned debate than rules about values and income in accounting and this has become the focal point for much financial accounting theory building. Since Canning's discourse links of london sale income, further contributions about income range from income based on general price level accounting Alexander, to income based on replacement values Edwards and Bell, to income based on exit price Chambers, and now to fair value IASB.